Quayque ne dar som
member ios Sambahsa Yahoo grupp, ho just lisen sem proposens qua sont ter ed
ne waito hin id accepten ios administrator kay scribe mieno mayn de id proposen os nudes tik tri
grammatical gensa. Ka nudtor os sambahsa, mehno aproposs od id bahsa
ghehdt bihe simplihsen, bet shayad ne est possible simplihes quanto
(ka actual nudtor esiet also duskwol change quanto ye un wahid tid),
ob to, me tanko tik ep todghi proposen de ia tri gensa.
Sei spehco id table
iom pronomens (yaschi gnohn ka "id table ios dekhschat"...
joc ;-) ), vido od id probleme est od id dative ed id genitive ios neutral
est id sam kam id dative ed id genitive ios masculin. Un makdour kay nudes tik tri grammatical gensa
ghehdiet ses nudes semper neutral pro ia falls quan anghen "naudht"
id indeterminat bet change ia dative ed genitive ios masculin med ia
dative ed genitive ios actual indeterminat (ed ne nudes id indeterminat pet). To maynt od id dative ed id
genitive ios nov masculin esient id actual pro id indeterminat. Esiet
pro me interessant sayge mathalan "id mensc" ed "id
person". Ne esiet sem confusion, ob est evident od "mensc"
ed "person" ne sont jects. Hatta quan leitiet de
anthopomorphic objects (kam leikus), to esiet clar ob id contexte
—anghen poitt mathalan sayge med id actual systeme "id mensc"
menxu bahnd de un mensclik leiku, contra "el mensc" quel
bayght tod leiku. Quayque tod distinction kwehct interessant in id
theoria, in id praxis est sambahsa un bahsa do quod anghen bilhassa
kwehrt tarjems, ed dat tod caracteristique ne est present in ia
natural bahsas, est baygh improbable od anghen dehlct tarjmes talg
situation wahid-ye nudend un extra genos.
Ithan, esient ia
sekwent exempels (ulter "id mensc", "id person",
"id anghen"):
-
Io dahm un buk ei studyent (nov dative neutral pro "veut" indeterminat). Io dahm un buk al studyent (nov dative masculin).
-
Vido id studyent / vido ia studyents. (genos neutral).
-
Id buk al studyent (nov genitive masculin) / id buk ios studyent (genitive neutral instet indeterminat). Etc.
Anghen naudhiet dar
ia werds pro "who". Schowi: quel/qui. To ne mayniet od
esient quar grammatical gensa, ob est lyt exageren mehne od tik dwo
werds forment un grammatical genos. Ta werds (quel, qui) sont
druve-ye ia werds qua anghen naudht, meis quem id hol indeterminat
genos.
Sont bet alya falls
in qua anghen baht to, mathalan: Sei anghen eiskwiet kwehre to, el
ghehdiet paurske kam.
Her est un meis stylistic sibia. Anghen
tehrbiet repetihes "anghen"
instet "el"
in tod fall. In id actual neud os sambahsa, "anghen" est
yaschi un synonym pro "el". In id dictionar "anghen"
maynt "person", bet anghen (iter) neudt tod werd yaschi
quasi ka pronomen, hatta destull
opser quem "el" in normal conversations. Mehno od to est
un
baygh interessant
sibia pro un bahsa,
shayad hatta interessanter
quem id existence os un quart genos.
Ye alyo gon, id possessive pronomen "ids", ghehldiet pro bo neutral ed indeterminat.
Id preposition "os" esiet "es/em" pro id masculin. Neid indeterminat.
De id vocalic euphonisation ne bahm, ob ta sont tik optional endens. In theoria ia ghehdient reman kam ia sont. Id hol systeme kwehkiet general-ye meis economic quem nun ed ho id pondos od id ne esiet minter precis quem id actual systeme (ed id table samt ia pronomens esiet minter dekhschatwent). ;-)
Ye alyo gon, id possessive pronomen "ids", ghehldiet pro bo neutral ed indeterminat.
Id preposition "os" esiet "es/em" pro id masculin. Neid indeterminat.
De id vocalic euphonisation ne bahm, ob ta sont tik optional endens. In theoria ia ghehdient reman kam ia sont. Id hol systeme kwehkiet general-ye meis economic quem nun ed ho id pondos od id ne esiet minter precis quem id actual systeme (ed id table samt ia pronomens esiet minter dekhschatwent). ;-)